PlanetCrap 6.0!
Front Page (ATOM) • Submission Bin (0) • ArchivesUsersLoginCreate Account
You are currently not logged in.
T O P I C
Remember when the Wii was the future of gaming?
January 26th 2010, 01:02 MSK by TreeFrog

Attitudes on the 'crap broadly reflect what I hear from my Wii-owning friends and from what little of the gaming press I read - the honeymoon's over and divorce is in the air. What happened?

Is it a shortage of games with any depth, since it's cheaper and easier to produce "party game" shovelware?
Is the platform's limited horsepower too big an obstacle for devs capable of producing A^64 games?
Is motion control just not that big of a deal after all?

And what does this mean for future hardware like Natal?
C O M M E N T S
Home » Topic: Remember when the Wii was the future of gaming?

|«« - Previous Page - Next Page - »»|
#65 by gaggle
2010-01-28 00:08:18
Meh. iBook only available in the US, fo' shame! Boo. Down in front. Well that was kind of a big attraction for me, so it'll be interesting to see when that stuff appears in Europeland.


I gotta say, one of the biggest questions I'm left with is the "scope" of the programs they intend for the iPad. If I can edit my iPhoto galleries and fiddle with iTunes smartlists that's great, I'm really turned on by the possibility of bringing one on vacation instead of my Macbook. But if they end up limiting the iPad apps to simple viewers like on the iPhone… well, it gets a lot less interesting imo.

Their signals right now aren't clear to me yet: They'll launch iLife apps that lets you author documents, that indicates a willingness to let it be a device with desktop capabilities where appropriate. On the other hand the iPad iTunes and iPhoto descriptions sound to me a lot more like their iPhone counterparts with limited capabilities.

Stuff like no multitasking is weird too, but there are so many rumors about the coming of multitasking that I'm willing to assume it's coming for both it and the iPhone.

"Roses are red, violets are blue, rubbish is dumped and so are you." - FML
#66 by gaggle
2010-01-28 00:11:26
With Bluetooth it sounds technically possible to tether to the iPhone. Or do they expect us to get two totally separate cellphone accounts? I think we'd all like to avoid that.

"Roses are red, violets are blue, rubbish is dumped and so are you." - FML
#67 by jjohnsen
2010-01-28 00:24:22
http://www.johnsenclan.com
#65 by gaggle
Their signals right now aren't clear to me yet: They'll launch iLife apps that lets you author documents, that indicates a willingness to let it be a device with desktop capabilities where appropriate. On the other hand the iPad iTunes and iPhoto descriptions sound to me a lot more like their iPhone counterparts with limited capabilities.

Except there is no iLife, only iWork.  So no photo editing.  You can make a spreadsheet though if you're into that sort of thing while sitting on your couch.

#68 by LPMiller
2010-01-28 00:35:07
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
#61 by jjohnsen
No multitasking, that seems a little weird.   And does it really have no usb port?


You can get a little dongle for USB or memory cards. But I don't see why you'd need USB anyway. If you need those stuff for more than occasional uses, get a netbook. It's not a netbook. It's a large ipod, or a kindle with some balls, maybe.

I think people want it to be something it was never going to be. It's for people that buy netbooks soley so they can surf the web from their couch. Or for people that want kindle, but color and like apps. Of course, I hate netbooks because they are retarded laptops, so I suppose it shouldn't surprise me that people hate the iPad because doesn't change that.

"Testiculos habet et bene pendentes" - "He has testicles, and they dangle nicely."

"LP, your big balls are a religion." - Jibble
#69 by gaggle
2010-01-28 00:55:04
Sorry yes, I meant iWork apps. My point is that there'll be apps that lets you create stuff, and that's a direction I'd like to see the iPad moving along. It depends on the apps being developed: No doubt all iPhone developers will make a massive move to quickly upscale their apps and launch it on the iPad part of the store. If that then becomes the expected level of interaction from an iPad app I can see new apps generally staying within what are essentially iPhone limits.

But hopefully more applications like the iWork apps will become the norm. Hopefully…

"Roses are red, violets are blue, rubbish is dumped and so are you." - FML
#70 by gaggle
2010-01-28 01:23:40
This is why Apple should buy me as an idea guy:

I don't care how exactly, but it'd be neat to be able to browse on my desktop, realize I'm late for work and rush out the door, and then have the same webpages open on my iPad. Bookmarks are already synced so that's one part of the equation solved, next step could be constant syncing of tabs.

"Roses are red, violets are blue, rubbish is dumped and so are you." - FML
#71 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 07:48:57
http://uglycode.com
Yeah, that's easy. All you need is a netbook with Firefox and Weave.

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#72 by deadlock
2010-01-28 11:24:23
http://www.deadlocked.org/
I can't see myself buying one (I'm happy with my iPod Touch for the moment and it seems to be pretty clobbered if you live outside the US a.k.a. the only fucking nation on Earth - seriously, sort your fucking shit out, there are other markets you cunts) but I am intrigued. I could see my wife really enjoying it since all she really does on the internet is check her email, Facebook and a few shopping sites.

And that's the crux - I don't think Apple have 99.9% of Internet commentators and forum-based whingers in mind as a fit for this thing so it doesn't really matter what most of us think about its deficiencies.

#73 by deadlock
2010-01-28 11:26:46
http://www.deadlocked.org/
I'm going to continue my rant about US-centricism by pointing out that the US doesn't even have the highrest rates of internet/cell penetration in the world; I'm pretty sure most of Western Europe is more connected in that respect but I can't be bothered looking for figures. Why let facts get in the way of a good moan?

#74 by LPMiller
2010-01-28 13:01:14
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
geez, I dunno why a US based company would release a product to the US first, one they might not even be all that sure about or yet ready to support demand at a world wide level and still need to work out the 3G with other countries which he said in the fucking presentation. No, it's US-centrism.

"Testiculos habet et bene pendentes" - "He has testicles, and they dangle nicely."

"LP, your big balls are a religion." - Jibble
#75 by Matt Perkins
2010-01-28 13:28:09
wizardque@yahoo.com http://whatwouldmattdo.com/
NEVER go first generation. Unless you're a business that makes a living on cutting edge tech, there's no reason to do so. And there are many reasons not to.

"Fucking Radio Shack. It's a wonder they even know how to use a bathroom and don't just walk around all day with shit in their pants." - smds
"the concept that a happy worker is a productive worker is hardly an entry from Matt's Big Book Of Things The Fairies Said." - Dum
#76 by Greg
2010-01-28 13:56:24
Sounds like it's deadlock's time of the month for an iPad.

#77 by Ng Yo
2010-01-28 14:49:22
http://www.taxi583.com
HOLLY SHIT!!!

CLANK CLANK CLANK

THE SKY IS FALLING!!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!

UBISOFT DECLARES WAR ON PC GAMERS.

VOTE YES FOR THE TOPIC YOU CUNTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

§ Pimp of  Mario's World. Hater of society. §
#78 by deadlock
2010-01-28 15:20:49
http://www.deadlocked.org/
LPMiller (#74):
geez, I dunno why a US based company would release a product to the US first, one they might not even be all that sure about or yet ready to support demand at a world wide level and still need to work out the 3G with other countries which he said in the fucking presentation. No, it's US-centrism.

I did say I was having a moan! Anyway, I'm not talking specifically about the iPad though that's part of it.

#79 by yotsuya
2010-01-28 15:25:52
Damn that BBC for showing their British-made TV shows in England first, then only in America after a few months or even years. Don't they know there's more TV sets in the US???!!!

#80 by Ng Yo
2010-01-28 15:44:03
http://www.taxi583.com
I just alerted 4chan

spread the word you dogs




















.root{v/f>$CALL}U(7)
fuck ubisoft
fuck ubisoft
fuck ubisoft
fuck ubisoft
fuck ubisoft
fuck ubisoft

§ Pimp of  Mario's World. Hater of society. §
#81 by LPMiller
2010-01-28 16:12:31
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
deadlock
LPMiller (#74):

geez, I dunno why a US based company would release a product to the US first, one they might not even be all that sure about or yet ready to support demand at a world wide level and still need to work out the 3G with other countries which he said in the fucking presentation. No, it's US-centrism.

I did say I was having a moan! Anyway, I'm not talking specifically about the iPad though that's part of it.


Pfft, it's not like it doesn't happen the other way around. Plenty of Euro cars, especially of the super car variety, never make it over here. Plenty of models of BMW and Mercedes, for that matter. Plenty of Japanese products either never get over here or take over a year to do so.  Unless you plan on picking one up at launch anyway, I'm not sure what the big deal is.

"Testiculos habet et bene pendentes" - "He has testicles, and they dangle nicely."

"LP, your big balls are a religion." - Jibble
#82 by LPMiller
2010-01-28 16:13:22
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
alright, what do I have to add to greasemonkey again to make it stop loading slow and giving me two quote buttons?

"Testiculos habet et bene pendentes" - "He has testicles, and they dangle nicely."

"LP, your big balls are a religion." - Jibble
#83 by Jamie
2010-01-28 16:26:37
jamie@jmadigan.net http://www.jmadigan.net
stats.mans.de

blog | Twitter | The Psychology of Gaming

"It was a little hard to tell how bad I was bleeding on account of the salsa" -- Jibble
#84 by CheesyPoof
2010-01-28 16:35:15
Specifically, add that to your adblock filter.

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#85 by deadlock
2010-01-28 17:17:11
http://www.deadlocked.org/
I SAID I WAS MOANING! Stop trying to reason with me!

#86 by gaggle
2010-01-28 17:36:21
That's woman logic! He's a witch! Burn him!

"Roses are red, violets are blue, rubbish is dumped and so are you." - FML
#87 by deadlock
2010-01-28 17:43:40
http://www.deadlocked.org/
Oh, and I just remembered! What I was actually bemoaning was the fact that iBooks is only available in the US at the moment, not that the iPad isn't available. And the first person that points out that you need an iPad to run iBooks gets a slap in the face with a hairy man-nipple.

#88 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 17:43:42
http://uglycode.com
I can imagine a more interesting kind of moaning.

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#89 by deadlock
2010-01-28 17:44:23
http://www.deadlocked.org/
From what I hear you can only imagine. AMIRITE GUYS!?

#90 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 17:46:12
http://uglycode.com
Like "oh, stupid Entourage eDGe, why are you only available in the US?"

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#91 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 17:47:28
http://uglycode.com
Also, screw you, mate.

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#92 by gaggle
2010-01-28 18:08:52
Is he right Honeypower?

"Roses are red, violets are blue, rubbish is dumped and so are you." - FML
#93 by deadlock
2010-01-28 18:09:35
http://www.deadlocked.org/
Milan:

Why do you capitalise the 'DG' bit but not the 'T' in 'entourage'?

#94 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 18:10:08
http://uglycode.com
So, how about that iPad, huh? Some interesting tech there.

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#95 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 18:11:19
http://uglycode.com
Eh. I didn't remember that. Don't get me wrong, I still hate the capitALisation, I just got used to writing it like that.

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#96 by anaqer
2010-01-28 18:32:40
#94 by Milan Brezovský
So, how about that iPad, huh? Some interesting tech there.

Big meh for me - much more cumbersome than a Touch but significantly less useful than a proper netbook? I'm sure you can find uses for it if you look hard enough, but I'll pass. (And that's not even going into the ridiculous pricing over here.)

I tried to change my avatar and this is what I get?!
#97 by deadlock
2010-01-28 18:36:34
http://www.deadlocked.org/
I'm not sure what to make of it to be honest. I understand and agree with a lot of the criticisms about it being less functional than a Netbook and so on but I can't help wondering if people are missing the point. I especially think the guys who are labouring under the illusion that it's a replacement for your MP3 player or iPhone are completely misunderstanding it. Maybe Apple don't see it as a Netbook type device and at this point we don't really get what it is or what role it's going to fulfil.

Except I think I kinda do - I can't see it replacing my iPod Touch as a music player, necessarily, but I can see it replacing or supplementing my Touch for the other things I use it for. I.e., browsing the web in bed or on the sofa, casual gaming and reading PDFs and so on. I can see it being more than that in some respects - someone on QT3 described it as a portal to view data stored elsewhere and I can grok that because I already use my Touch for that to some degree. As I mentioned earlier, I can really see my wife digging this for Facebook, browsing and email.

#98 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 18:38:02
http://uglycode.com
Success! Digression accomplished.

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#99 by deadlock
2010-01-28 18:39:31
http://www.deadlocked.org/
Oh, and pricing-wise Apple tend to do $1=€1 in Ireland so I think it will be reasonable.

The one thing I think is odd - and I'm surprised that I haven't seen anyone else mention this - is that it appears to have retained the same approach to icons etc. as the other iPhoneOS devices even down to the (4x4)+4 grid. Whatever about the lack of stacking or whatever, I'm surprised that with that extra screen estate Apple haven't increased the number of apps on each page and in the dock.

#100 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 18:45:08
http://uglycode.com
OK, if I had to pay €500, I'd rather pay some extra and get Portege. Oh, wait, that's more like €1000. Doesn't matter, I still like it.

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#101 by gaggle
2010-01-28 19:20:36
Finally managed to sit through 500 Days of Summer, it's cute and I like it.

"Roses are red, violets are blue, rubbish is dumped and so are you." - FML
#102 by Shadarr
2010-01-28 19:33:20
shadarr@gmail.com http://digital-luddite.com
deadlock (#97):
I especially think the guys who are labouring under the illusion that it's a replacement for your MP3 player or iPhone are completely misunderstanding it.

What I see is a larger device running the iPhoneOS, which means no multi-tasking.  That severly limits the usability, and I'm frankly surprised they didn't fix it.  Is it more than just a larger iPod Touch?  If so, how?

"I hope you one day decide to smarten the fuck up so I can stand to look at your posts." - gaggle
#103 by LPMiller
2010-01-28 19:37:59
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
Multitasking is rumored to be part of version 4 of the OS, due out in spring.  However, other then running pandora while I surf, I dunno what I'd use multitasking for.

"Testiculos habet et bene pendentes" - "He has testicles, and they dangle nicely."

"LP, your big balls are a religion." - Jibble
#104 by CheesyPoof
2010-01-28 19:39:46
Since it's a bigger device I would be surprised if it had the capability to multitask. Assuming so, I'd imagine that the iPhone OS would support multitasking sooner rather than later. The Android phones do multitasking and the iPhone Next is going to have to catchup to them soon enough. Assuming that it will have multitasking patched in within a few months, I think the idea to use the iPhone OS is smart. It's lightweight enough that you can achieve the long battery life and instant on that you would expect in a device like that (something that netbooks don't do unless it's waking up from sleep).

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#105 by CheesyPoof
2010-01-28 19:40:45
...surprise if it didn't have...

<Hugin_len> Basically, cheesy doesn't have awful taste in music, he's simply very white.
#106 by Jamie
2010-01-28 19:46:33
jamie@jmadigan.net http://www.jmadigan.net
#102 by Shadarr

What I see is a larger device running the iPhoneOS, which means no multi-tasking.

This is why you wait and buy the 2nd generation iPad.

blog | Twitter | The Psychology of Gaming

"It was a little hard to tell how bad I was bleeding on account of the salsa" -- Jibble
#107 by Shadarr
2010-01-28 20:06:28
shadarr@gmail.com http://digital-luddite.com
I'll wait a lot longer than that.

"I hope you one day decide to smarten the fuck up so I can stand to look at your posts." - gaggle
#108 by LPMiller
2010-01-28 20:55:56
lpmiller@gotapex.com http://www.gotapex.com
and iPhones can certainly multitask, as jailbreaking shows. So it's just a matter of the OS.

"Testiculos habet et bene pendentes" - "He has testicles, and they dangle nicely."

"LP, your big balls are a religion." - Jibble
#109 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 21:47:38
http://uglycode.com
I don't mean to be rude, but which 833 MHz CPU with 256 MB RAM can't multitask? And If Wikipedia Remembers Correctly, it's got Darwin/BSD-based OS, so there are absolutely no hardware/software barriers. It's just Copy&Paste 2.0. "Behold! We gave you a feature. That fucking Nokia had 10 years back."

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#110 by Jamie
2010-01-28 21:51:34
jamie@jmadigan.net http://www.jmadigan.net
Bleh, I'm officially not interested in Bioshock 2's multiplayer now. From an article on Joystiq: "the game does not include an option to kick troublesome players. 2K Marin suggests that players report any cheaters and griefers, quit and find a different match."

Yeah, because THAT'S reasonable.

Also, there's some stuff in there about following MW2's lead and not offering dedicated servers or LAN play. Suck it, PC gamers!

blog | Twitter | The Psychology of Gaming

"It was a little hard to tell how bad I was bleeding on account of the salsa" -- Jibble
#111 by BobJustBob
2010-01-28 21:54:44
How could anyone have ever been interested in Bioshock 2's multiplayer? Or in Bioshock 2 at all, knowing it has multiplayer? It's a textbook example of the soulless cash-in sequel.

BUYBUYBUY
#112 by Milan Brezovský
2010-01-28 22:05:56
http://uglycode.com
I wish someone would buy System Shock IP from EA. I wouldn't mind a soulless cash-in System Shock sequel. (Relatively speaking.)

Parhelic Triangle is coming.
#113 by BobJustBob
2010-01-28 22:12:01
Expanding the discussion to sequels not made by the original devs, I'm rather excited about Bohemia's upcoming Carrier Command sequel/remake/whatever. I think their kind of crazy overambitious kitchen sink design is perfect for the game.

BUYBUYBUY
#114 by Matt Perkins
2010-01-28 22:27:32
wizardque@yahoo.com http://whatwouldmattdo.com/
I'm still playing Fallout 3 myself. I beat the game and now I'm exploring the world and slowly doing the Broken Steel add on (the only one I purchased).

I know they made this huge world and all, but a LOT of the destinations feel like they could have been fleshed out more. That said, still a mess of fun. I traded Fawkes for the Paladin woman because she'll sneak with me...and I can get around her in doorways. I swear man, I'd go into a small room and be stuck with SLOWLY pushing Fawkes back out in front of me.

"Fucking Radio Shack. It's a wonder they even know how to use a bathroom and don't just walk around all day with shit in their pants." - smds
"the concept that a happy worker is a productive worker is hardly an entry from Matt's Big Book Of Things The Fairies Said." - Dum
C O M M E N T S
Home » Topic: Remember when the Wii was the future of gaming?

|«« - Previous Page - Next Page - »»|
P O S T   A   C O M M E N T

You need to be logged in to post a comment here. If you don't have an account yet, you can create one here. Registration is free.
C R A P T A G S
Simple formatting: [b]bold[/b], [i]italic[/i], [u]underline[/u]
Web Links: [url=www.mans.de]Cool Site[/url], [url]www.mans.de[/url]
Email Links: [email=some@email.com]Email me[/email], [email]some@email.com[/email]
Simple formatting: Quoted text: [quote]Yadda yadda[/quote]
Front Page (ATOM) • Submission Bin (0) • ArchivesUsersLoginCreate Account
You are currently not logged in.
There are currently 309 people browsing this site. [Details]